| |
|
EVIDENCE FOR WHEN THE GOSPEL OF LUKE WAS WRITTEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Protected by Copyscape - DO NOT COPY |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
SOURCE OF THE DATE WRITTEN |
|
DATE WRITTEN |
|
|
BOOK |
Number Scholars |
|
|
EARLY |
LATE |
AVERAGE |
|
|
Luke |
1 |
Peter Ainsilie, D.D. A.D. 58 to 70 |
|
58 |
70 |
64.0 |
|
|
Luke |
2 |
Apologetics Study Bible, Ted Cabal, Ph.D. Editor |
|
60 |
61 |
60.5 |
|
|
Luke |
3 |
An Introduction to the New Testament, D.A. Carson Ph.D. & Douglas J. Moo,
PhD. 60's |
|
60 |
69 |
64.5 |
|
|
Luke |
4 |
Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, on or before A.D. 64 |
|
63 |
64 |
63.5 |
|
|
Luke |
5 |
Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics prior A.D,
60 |
|
59 |
59 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
6 |
The Bible Knowledge Commentary, John Walvood, Ph.D. Roy Zuck, Ph.D.
A.D. 58 to 60 |
|
58 |
60 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
7 |
Biblical Illustrator, N.T. Archbishop Thomson A.D. 58
to 60 |
|
58 |
60 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
8 |
Mark C. Black, Ph.D. AD 65 to 85 |
|
65 |
85 |
75.0 |
|
|
Luke |
9 |
Believer's Bible Commentary, William McDonald, Ph.D. Arthur Forstad, Ph.D.
A.D. 61-62 |
|
60 |
61 |
60.5 |
|
|
Luke |
10 |
Believer's Study Bible, W.A.Criswell, Ph.D., Editor, A
date of A.D. 59–61 is most probable. |
|
59 |
61 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
11 |
Craig L. Bloomberg, Ph.D. earlier than A.D. 62 |
|
61 |
61 |
61.0 |
|
|
Luke |
12 |
Blue Letter Bible, Late fifties or early sixties. |
|
58 |
62 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
13 |
Darrel L. Bock, Ph.D. Early to mid-sixties |
|
60 |
65 |
62.5 |
|
|
Luke |
14 |
Raymond Brown, Ph.D. AD 85,
give or take 5 to 10 years |
|
75 |
95 |
85.0 |
|
|
Luke |
15 |
F.F. Bruce, Ph.D. Between 60 and
70 AD |
|
60 |
70 |
65.0 |
|
|
Luke |
16 |
D.A. Carson, R.T. France, and G.J. Wenham, eds. New Bible Commentary: 21
Century Edition, 60 to 65 CE |
|
60 |
65 |
62.5 |
|
|
Luke |
17 |
Hans Conzelmann, Th.D. AD 80
- 100 for Luke-Acts, with a likely range of AD 80
- 90 Professor of New Testament at Gottingem, ThD
from Tubingen (Yet
again, the recognized HEIGHT of European liberal Bibliccal-Critical
Scholarship) Author of one of THE BEST Critical, Academic Commentaries on
Acts. |
|
80 |
90 |
85.0 |
|
|
Luke |
18 |
M. G. Easton M. A., D. D., AD 60 or 63, when Luke was in
Caesarea |
|
60 |
63 |
61.5 |
|
|
Luke |
19 |
James M. Efird, Ph.D. AD 75
to 80 |
|
75 |
80 |
77.5 |
|
|
Luke |
20 |
ESV Bible, Wayne Gruden General Editor |
|
60 |
61 |
60.5 |
|
|
Luke |
21 |
ESV Study Bible, AD 62 |
|
62 |
62 |
62.0 |
|
|
Luke |
22 |
David A. Fiensy, Ph.D. Before
AD 62, perhaps between 58 and 60 |
|
58 |
60 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
23 |
Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Ph.D. AD
80 to 85 |
|
80 |
85 |
82.5 |
|
|
Luke |
24 |
Norval Geldenhuys, Th.M. AD 64-65 |
|
64 |
65 |
64.5 |
|
|
Luke |
25 |
Norman L. Geisler, Ph.D. c. 60 |
|
60 |
60 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
26 |
Robert Gromacki, Th.D. A.D. 56 to 58 |
|
56 |
58 |
57.0 |
|
|
Luke |
27 |
Robert H. Gundry, Ph.D. A.D. 57 to 62 |
|
57 |
62 |
59.5 |
|
|
Luke |
28 |
Donald Guthrie, Ph.D. AD 63
to 64 |
|
63 |
64 |
63.5 |
|
|
Luke |
29 |
Gary R. Hamberasn Ph.D. A.D. 60 to 62 |
|
60 |
62 |
61.0 |
|
|
Luke |
30 |
William Hendriksen, Ph.D. AD
61-63 |
|
61 |
63 |
62.0 |
|
|
Luke |
31 |
A.E. Hill, Ph.D. AD 60 |
|
60 |
60 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
32 |
John Holland, Ph.D. AD 68-78 |
|
68 |
78 |
73.0 |
|
|
Luke |
33 |
Holman Bible Handbook, David S. Dockery, Ph.D. Editor |
|
62 |
62 |
62.0 |
|
|
Luke |
34 |
Nelson's Complete Book of Bible Maps and Charts A.D. 58-63 |
|
58 |
63 |
60.5 |
|
|
Luke |
35 |
Nelsen'sStudy Bible H.Wayne House, Th.D. J.D. Editor
early to mid 60's |
|
60 |
65 |
62.5 |
|
|
Luke |
36 |
Morris A. Inch, Ph.D. , on or before A.D. 64 |
|
63 |
64 |
63.5 |
|
|
Luke |
37 |
R. Jamieson, A.R. Fausset, and D. Brown, eds.
AD 50 to 60 Professor of New
Testament at Trinity College, Bristol England |
|
50 |
60 |
55.0 |
|
|
Luke |
38 |
Luke Timothy Johnson, Ph.D.
AD 80 - 85 for Luke (perhaps a bit earlier ... he
hedges toward 75 CE at times) - Professor of New Testament at Emory
University, Candler School of Theology |
|
80 |
85 |
82.5 |
|
|
Luke |
39 |
Howard Clark Kee, Ph.D. AD 85 |
|
85 |
85 |
85.0 |
|
|
Luke |
40 |
Werner Georg Kummel, Ph.D. AD 70 to 90 |
|
70 |
90 |
80.0 |
|
|
Luke |
41 |
Richard C.H. Lenski, D.D.
After AD 66, but before 70 |
|
66 |
70 |
68.0 |
|
|
Luke |
42 |
John MacArthur, Ph.D.
approximately AD 60 or 61 |
|
60 |
61 |
60.5 |
|
|
Luke |
43 |
K.E. Malberg, AD 59 to 61 |
|
59 |
61 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
44 |
I. Howard Marsall, Not far off A.D. 70 |
|
70 |
70 |
70.0 |
|
|
Luke |
45 |
Bruce Metzger, Ph.D. AD 75 to
85 |
|
75 |
85 |
80.0 |
|
|
Luke |
46 |
M.S. Mills, Ph.D. AD 53 |
|
53 |
53 |
53.0 |
|
|
Luke |
47 |
J.P. Moreland, Ph.D. Just prior to Acts |
|
61 |
61 |
61.0 |
|
|
Luke |
48 |
Thomas Nelson's KJV Study Bible, Wayne A. Brindle, Th.D. Editor |
|
60 |
62 |
61.0 |
|
|
Luke |
49 |
Nelson's NKJV Study Bible, Earl D. Radmacher, Th.D. General Editor |
|
60 |
65 |
62.5 |
|
|
Luke |
50 |
John Nolland, Ph.D. late AD
60's to late 70's |
|
67 |
77 |
72.0 |
|
|
Luke |
51 |
S.L. Peterson, AD 75
Timeline Charts of the Western Church |
|
75 |
75 |
75.0 |
|
|
Luke |
52 |
Reformation Study Bible, R.C. Sproul, Ph.D. General Editor,
early 60's |
|
60 |
63 |
61.5 |
|
|
Luke |
53 |
J.A.T. Robinson, Ph.D. AD 57 to 60 |
|
57 |
60 |
58.5 |
|
|
Luke |
54 |
T. Robinson, AD 85 to 90
The Bible Timeline |
|
85 |
90 |
87.5 |
|
|
Luke |
55 |
Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Th.D., Ph.D., Ryrie Study Bible
AD 60 |
|
60 |
60 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
56 |
Edward P. Sanders, Ph.D. AD
75 to 85 |
|
75 |
85 |
80.0 |
|
|
Luke |
57 |
Edward Schweizer, Ph.D. AD 80
to 85 Professor of New Testament at the
University of Zurich (Again, about as Critical and liberal as they come) |
|
80 |
85 |
82.5 |
|
|
Luke |
58 |
William Smith, Ph.D. Smith's Bible Dictionary. A.D. 58
yo 60 |
|
58 |
60 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
59 |
Carsten Peter Thiede, Ph.D.
Prior to AD 62 Director of the Institute for
Basic Epistemological Research in Paderborn, Germany |
|
61 |
61 |
61.0 |
|
|
Luke |
60 |
Edward J. Tinsley, Ph.D. AD
75 to 80 |
|
75 |
80 |
77.5 |
|
|
Luke |
61 |
Joseph B. Tyson, Ph.D. 120 to
125 CE "I think there was an earlier version of
Luke in circulation 70 to 90 CE." Professor emeritus of Religious Studies
at SMU |
|
70 |
90 |
80.0 |
|
|
Luke |
62 |
Merrill F. Unger, Ph.D. Th.D, prior A.D. 61 |
|
60 |
60 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
63 |
Edwin Yamauchi, Ph.D. probably written before A.D. 64 |
|
63 |
63 |
63.0 |
|
|
Luke |
64 |
David Y. Young, Ph.D. 70's |
|
70 |
79 |
74.5 |
|
|
Luke |
65 |
Franklin W. Young, Ph.D. AD 80 to 90 |
|
80 |
90 |
85.0 |
|
|
Luke |
66 |
The Woman's Study Bible, Dorothy Kelley Patterson, Ph.D. General Editor |
|
59 |
61 |
60.0 |
|
|
Luke |
67 |
Willmington's Bible Handbook, Harold L. Willmington, Ph.D. |
|
59 |
59 |
59.0 |
|
|
Luke |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luke |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luke |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luke |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number Scholars |
|
67 |
Average |
66.5 |
|
| |
|
Updated 5/27/2011 Copyright Errant Skeptics Research Institute 1999 to 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Protected by Copyscape - Electronic Copies Are Not Allowed |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Permission is granted for up to 100 copies on printed paper for Sunday
School. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
***** |
See the Luke data sheet for reasons why Luke and Acts should be dated early. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
***** |
Luke was written prior to Acts and by the same author. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Support this ministry |
|
|
|
|
|